Hazel Perfect

885 citations
36 papers · 557 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Hazel Perfect

32 papers receiving 468 citations

Peers

Hazel Perfect
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 402
  • Geometry and Topology 143
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 52
  • Algebra and Number Theory 61
  • Numerical Analysis 64
Replace Ivo G. Rosenberg with:
Ivo G. Rosenberg Canada
Nicolai Vorobjov United Kingdom
Wojciech A. Trybulec
B. F. Caviness United States
Laureano González-Vega Spain
D. Yu. Grigor'ev Russia
H. L. Abbott Canada
André Bouchet France
R. B. Bapat India
David Barnette United States
Hazel Perfect relative to Ivo G. Rosenberg Canada Ivo G. Rosenberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ivo G. Rosenberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hazel Perfect

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hazel Perfect's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hazel Perfect with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hazel Perfect more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hazel Perfect

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hazel Perfect. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hazel Perfect. The network helps show where Hazel Perfect may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Hazel Perfect, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hazel Perfect Line = papers co-authored together Hazel Perfect links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195587
2 196861
3 196556
4 195355
5 196645
6 196744
7 196533
8 195228
9 197024
10 196616
11 198016
12 196915
13 196911
14 198810
15 19717
16 19737
17 19666
18 19724
19 19813
20 19643

About Hazel Perfect

Hazel Perfect is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 36 papers that have together received 557 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Algebra and Logic (9 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (7 papers), Digital Image Processing Techniques (7 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (6 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (5 papers), semigroups and automata theory (4 papers), Mathematics and Applications (3 papers) and Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (402 citations), Geometry and Topology (143 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (52 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (61 citations) and Numerical Analysis (64 citations). Hazel Perfect has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include L. Mirsky, John Pym, Victor Bryant, Richard A. Brualdi, H. Burkill and Walter Ledermann. Their work appears in journals such as Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, Duke Mathematical Journal and Journal of the London Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact