John Pennington

651 citations
13 papers · 465 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

John Pennington

9 papers receiving 406 citations

Peers

John Pennington
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 103
  • Applied Psychology 42
  • Social Psychology 122
  • Public Administration 21
  • Information Systems and Management 42
Replace Michelle M. Duguid with:
Michelle M. Duguid United States
Jens Mazei Germany
Lieven Brebels Belgium
Christy Zhou Koval United States
Sandy Bogaert Belgium
Clarence W. Von Bergen United States
Emily C. Bianchi United States
Larry B. Heuer United States
John G. Veres United States
Wilhelmina Wosinska United States
John Pennington relative to Michelle M. Duguid United States Michelle M. Duguid's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Michelle M. Duguid · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Pennington

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Pennington's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Pennington with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Pennington more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Pennington

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Pennington. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Pennington. The network helps show where John Pennington may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside John Pennington, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Pennington Line = papers co-authored together John Pennington links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1994405
2 199421
3 200214
4 201010
5 19955
6 19923
7 20032
8 20002
9 19841
10 19941
11 19971
12
The Not-So-Light Princess: Tori Amos and Samuel Adamson’s Reimagining of George MacDonald’s Classic Fairy Tale
20150
13
Of “Frustrate Desire”: Feminist Self-Postponement in George MacDonald’s Lilith
20020

About John Pennington

John Pennington is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Space and Planetary Science, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Paleontology and Gender Studies, having authored 13 papers that have together received 465 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (3 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (3 papers), Joseph Conrad and Literature (2 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (1 paper), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper), Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research (1 paper) and Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (103 citations), Applied Psychology (42 citations), Social Psychology (122 citations), Public Administration (21 citations) and Information Systems and Management (42 citations). John Pennington has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Barry R. Schlenker, Thomas W. Britt, Kevin Doherty, Et. Al, Robert E. Boyer, Colin Nicholson, Finbar McCormick, Sheila Hamilton‐Dyer, Roy Rosenzweig and Peter Skidmore. Their work appears in journals such as Extrapolation, Psychological Review, ˜The œLion and the unicorn, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and Marvels & Tales.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact