Ian Proops

797 citations
25 papers · 303 · h-index 10

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 1%
    • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
    • War, Ethics, and Justification
    • Philosophy, Science, and History
    • Philosophy and History of Science

Papers in

Ian Proops

20 papers receiving 188 citations

Peers

Ian Proops
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Philosophy 249
  • History and Philosophy of Science 86
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 175
  • Theoretical Computer Science 15
  • General Psychology 2
Replace Michael Kober with:
Michael Kober United States
Oskari Kuusela United Kingdom
Gary Ebbs United States
Donna M. Summerfield United States
Steve Gerrard United States
Genia Schönbaumsfeld United Kingdom
Jill Vance Buroker United States
Joseph L. Camp United States
Stephen Kearns United States
Gerald Vision United States
Ian Proops relative to Michael Kober United States Michael Kober's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.8×
Michael Kober · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ian Proops

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Proops's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Proops with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Proops more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Proops

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Proops. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Proops. The network helps show where Ian Proops may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Ian Proops, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ian Proops Line = papers co-authored together Ian Proops links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200158
2 200354
3 201330
4 200423
5 201022
6 200517
7
Kant on the cosmological argument
201415
8 200212
9 201412
10 199710
11 20219
12 20139
13 20117
14 20066
15 20076
16 20065
17 20023
18 20122
19 20232
20 20211

About Ian Proops

Ian Proops is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Political Science and International Relations and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 25 papers that have together received 303 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (12 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (12 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (8 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (7 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (3 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (2 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (2 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (249 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (86 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (175 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (15 citations) and General Psychology (2 citations). Ian Proops has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Michael Kremer and Roy Sorensen. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, Journal of the history of philosophy, Noûs, European Journal of Philosophy and Philosophical Topics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact