Ian Proops
Impact in
- Philosophy top 1%
- Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
- Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Theoretical Computer Science top 5%
- History and Theory of Mathematics
Papers in
- Philosophy 23
- Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations 10
- Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications 10
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 5
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 2
-
- Philosophy, Science, and History 4
- Co-authors
- ROY A. SORENSEN (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Philosophical Review (4 papers)Journal of the history of philosophy (3 papers)Noûs (2 papers)European Journal of Philosophy (2 papers)Ratio (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ian Proops
20 papers receiving 185 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
- Philosophy 233
- Theoretical Computer Science 20
- History and Philosophy of Science 54
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 57
- General Arts and Humanities 2
Countries citing papers authored by Ian Proops
This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Proops's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Proops with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Proops more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Proops
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Proops. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Proops. The network helps show where Ian Proops may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Ian Proops, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 54 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 53 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 18 | |
| 7 | Kant on the cosmological argument | 2014 | 15 |
| 8 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 1 |
About Ian Proops
Ian Proops is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Theoretical Computer Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 25 papers that have together received 300 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations (10 papers), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (10 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (1 paper) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (233 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (20 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (54 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (57 citations) and General Arts and Humanities (2 citations). Ian Proops has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include ROY A. SORENSEN. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, Journal of the history of philosophy, Noûs, European Journal of Philosophy and Ratio.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.