John Manion

14 papers receiving 877 citations

John Manion's Hit Papers

Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata 2002 · 624 citations
6240+8+16Years since publication200400600

Peers

John Manion
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Computer Science Applications 459
  • Information Systems 201
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 94
  • Artificial Intelligence 245
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 102
Replace George Fletcher with:
George Fletcher Netherlands
Shu-Hsien Huang Taiwan
Kathleen Carter United States
Aleksandar Kovačević Serbia
Roberto Araya Chile
Michael Cole United States
Thomas Green United Kingdom
Kai Orton United States
Simone Braun Germany
Michal Gordon Israel
John Manion relative to George Fletcher Netherlands George Fletcher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
George Fletcher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Manion

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Manion's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Manion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Manion more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Manion

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Manion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Manion. The network helps show where John Manion may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Manion, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Manion Line = papers co-authored together John Manion links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1
Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata
Hit paper breakdown →
2002624
2 202058
3 201949
4 202345
5 201645
6 201945
7 202025
8 202525
9 201924
10 201912
11 201911
12 202411
13 20218
14 20111

About John Manion

John Manion is a scholar working on Physiology, Sensory Systems, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Neurology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 14 papers that have together received 983 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (3 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (2 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (2 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (1 paper), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (1 paper), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (1 paper) and Mechanical Failure Analysis and Simulation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (459 citations), Information Systems (201 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (94 citations), Artificial Intelligence (245 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (102 citations). John Manion has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include G. Gregory Neely, Thang M. Khuong, Matthew A. Waller, Qiao‐Ping Wang, Man-Tat Lau, Lisa J. Oyston, Leslie Caron, Elizabeth Hess Ford, Jamie B. Littleboy and Yong Q. Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Neuroscience, Cells, Mucosal Immunology, Science Advances and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact