John M. Felt

402 citations
26 papers · 276 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

John M. Felt

24 papers receiving 273 citations

Peers

John M. Felt
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Applied Psychology 31
  • Clinical Psychology 95
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 14
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 48
  • Health 25
Replace Emily White with:
Emily White United States
Chelsea J. Siwik United States
Lizu Lai China
Kristian Kleinke Germany
Randy A. Boley United States
Xinhua Chen China
Yongqi Zhong United States
Chellamuthu Ramasubramanian India
Dingxi Bai China
John M. Felt relative to Emily White United States Emily White's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Emily White · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John M. Felt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Felt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Felt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Felt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Felt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Felt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Felt. The network helps show where John M. Felt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John M. Felt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John M. Felt Line = papers co-authored together John M. Felt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201742
2 201838
3 201734
4 201821
5 202020
6 201620
7 201519
8 202117
9 202013
10 20238
11 20207
12 20226
13 20185
14 20155
15 20224
16 20233
17 20233
18 20243
19 20242
20 20232

About John M. Felt

John M. Felt is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Behavioral Neuroscience and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 26 papers that have together received 276 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (5 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (4 papers), Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (4 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (3 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (2 papers) and Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (31 citations), Clinical Psychology (95 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (14 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (48 citations) and Health (25 citations). John M. Felt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Depaoli, Jitske Tiemensma, Jennie G. Noll, Holly Rus, Martin J. Sliwinski, Sonja D. Winter, Sheridan Miyamoto, Sarah A. Font, Kate Guastaferro and Chad E. Shenk. Their work appears in journals such as The Journals of Gerontology Series B, European Journal of Endocrinology, Child Maltreatment, Anxiety Stress & Coping and Journal of Adolescent Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact