John Lever

1.9k citations
78 papers · 1.4k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

John Lever

71 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

John Lever
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
  • Biophysics 124
  • Business and International Management 24
  • Reproductive Medicine 72
  • Sociology and Political Science 405
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 64
Replace Patricia Harris with:
Patricia Harris United States
Nanibaa’ A. Garrison United States
Gail F. Davies United Kingdom
David A. Cotter Canada
David W. McCurdy Australia
Joan H. Fujimura United States
Helge Torgersen Austria
Yi Tao China
Helen Jones United Kingdom
Jonathan D. Casper United States
John Lever relative to Patricia Harris United States Patricia Harris's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×12.8×
Patricia Harris · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Lever

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Lever's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Lever with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Lever more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Lever

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Lever. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Lever. The network helps show where John Lever may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Lever, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Lever Line = papers co-authored together John Lever links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004159
2 2012137
3 201580
4 200368
5 199566
6 201559
7 200659
8 201857
9 201748
10 201345
11 200340
12
Imaging delta- and mu-opioid receptors by PET in lung carcinoma patients.
200740
13 201936
14 201336
15 201235
16 201430
17 202227
18 200222
19 202219
20 201919

About John Lever

John Lever is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Animal Science and Zoology, Food Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Small Animals, having authored 78 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Halal products and consumer behavior (22 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (8 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (7 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (5 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (5 papers), Culinary Culture and Tourism (5 papers), Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (4 papers) and Identification and Quantification in Food (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (124 citations), Business and International Management (24 citations), Reproductive Medicine (72 citations), Sociology and Political Science (405 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (64 citations). John Lever has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Mara Miele, Ryan Powell, Paul Milbourne, Deema Refai, Roberta E. Sonnino, Radi Haloub, Gerard McElwee, Robert Angus Smith, Johan Fischer and Stephen Douglas Johnston. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Rural Studies, Geoforum, Aquaculture, Reproduction Fertility and Development and Sociology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact