Daniel S. Elson

6.4k citations
201 papers · 4.0k · h-index 37

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel S. Elson

189 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

Daniel S. Elson
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
  • Biophysics 920
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 106
  • Biomedical Engineering 2.1k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 872
  • Instrumentation 121
Replace Adam Wax with:
Adam Wax United States
Igor Meglinski Finland
Tomasz Tkaczyk United States
Daniel L. Marks United States
Michael R. Descour United States
David D. Sampson Australia
Liang Gao United States
Rongguang Liang United States
Rainer A. Leitgeb Austria
Mark C. Pierce United States
Daniel S. Elson relative to Adam Wax United States Adam Wax's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Adam Wax · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel S. Elson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel S. Elson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel S. Elson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel S. Elson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel S. Elson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel S. Elson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel S. Elson. The network helps show where Daniel S. Elson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel S. Elson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel S. Elson Line = papers co-authored together Daniel S. Elson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 201 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013194
2 2017173
3 2020117
4 2008102
5 2017101
6 200999
7 201785
8 201085
9 201683
10 200477
11 201677
12 201475
13 201370
14 200370
15 201768
16 200468
17 201366
18 200459
19 201158
20 202055

About Daniel S. Elson

Daniel S. Elson is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biophysics, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 201 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (64 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (56 papers), Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry (25 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (22 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (20 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (20 papers), Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies (19 papers) and Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (920 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (106 citations), Biomedical Engineering (2.1k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (872 citations) and Instrumentation (121 citations). Daniel S. Elson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ji Qi, Neil T. Clancy, Danail Stoyanov, P. M. W. French, Guang‐Zhong Yang, Mark A. A. Neil, Ara Darzi, Lena Maier‐Hein, Laura Marcu and George B. Hanna. Their work appears in journals such as Biomedical Optics Express, Optics Letters, Journal of Biomedical Optics, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery and Optics Express.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact