John Hoberman

51 papers receiving 934 citations

Peers

John Hoberman
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Gender Studies 414
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies 24
  • Sociology and Political Science 770
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 183
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 33
Replace Paul Dimeo with:
Paul Dimeo United Kingdom
Sigmund Loland Norway
Gertrud Pfister Denmark
Angela Schneider Canada
Kath Woodward United Kingdom
Jim Parry Czechia
Jesper Andreasson Sweden
Bruce King United States
Andrew Sparkes United Kingdom
Angelos Rodafinos Greece
John Hoberman relative to Paul Dimeo United Kingdom Paul Dimeo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Paul Dimeo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Hoberman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Hoberman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Hoberman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Hoberman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Hoberman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Hoberman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Hoberman. The network helps show where John Hoberman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside John Hoberman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Hoberman Line = papers co-authored together John Hoberman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Mortal Engines: The Science of Performance and the Dehumanization of Sport
1992203
2 1995109
3 1977103
4 198490
5 200587
6
The Olympic Crisis: Sport, Politics and the Moral Order
198649
7 201237
8 200236
9 201336
10 199335
11
Doping and public policy
200435
12 201128
13 198524
14 200024
15 201123
16
Entertaining America: Jews, Movies, and Broadcasting
200320
17 198917
18 199214
19 200710
20
The Dream Life: Movies, Media, And The Mythology Of The Sixties
200310

About John Hoberman

John Hoberman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and History, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Doping in Sports (13 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (9 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (8 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (7 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (5 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (3 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (2 papers) and Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (414 citations), Life-span and Life-course Studies (24 citations), Sociology and Political Science (770 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (183 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (33 citations). John Hoberman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Charles E. Yesalis, Verner Møller, Mark Slobin, Richard D. Mandell, Ask Vest Christiansen, Jeffrey Shandler, Maurice Berger, Ivan Waddington, John Gleaves and Miriam Hansen. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The International Journal of the History of Sport, Society, Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine and Quest.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact