Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine

2.7k papers and 71.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.7k papers published in Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 71.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine usually cover Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (1.3k papers), Surgery (1.0k papers) and Epidemiology (607 papers) specifically the topics of Sports injuries and prevention (1.1k papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (456 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury Research (421 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine are Willem Meeuwisse, Jim Macintyre, Kevin M. Guskiewicz, Carolyn A. Emery, Paul McCrory, Ian Shrier, Timothy D. Noakes, Monica Klungland Torstveit, Jorunn Sundgot‐Borgen and Nicola Maffulli.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025