Paul Dimeo

53 papers receiving 800 citations

Peers

Paul Dimeo
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Gender Studies 309
  • Sociology and Political Science 732
  • Applied Psychology 74
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 222
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies 9
Replace Fabien Ohl with:
Fabien Ohl Switzerland
Terry Engelberg Australia
Jules Woolf United States
Alan M. Klein United States
Randolph M. Feezell United States
Agnès Elling Netherlands
R. Kelly Crace United States
Mark Rubinfeld United Kingdom
Farah Palmer New Zealand
Wayne E. Hensley United States
Paul Dimeo relative to Fabien Ohl Switzerland Fabien Ohl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Fabien Ohl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Dimeo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Dimeo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Dimeo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Dimeo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Dimeo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Dimeo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Dimeo. The network helps show where Paul Dimeo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Paul Dimeo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Dimeo Line = papers co-authored together Paul Dimeo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003112
2
A History of Drug Use in Sport: 1876 - 1976: Beyond Good and Evil
200786
3 201457
4 201846
5
Elite sport, doping and public health
200941
6 201735
7 200434
8 200827
9 200926
10 201426
11 201524
12
The Anti-Doping Crisis in Sport: Causes, Consequences, Solutions
201824
13 201222
14 202020
15 201720
16 200119
17 201219
18 201618
19 201317
20 200216

About Paul Dimeo

Paul Dimeo is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Economics and Econometrics and Social Psychology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 865 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Doping in Sports (32 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (25 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (21 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (16 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (11 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (2 papers), European history and politics (2 papers) and Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (309 citations), Sociology and Political Science (732 citations), Applied Psychology (74 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (222 citations) and Life-span and Life-course Studies (9 citations). Paul Dimeo has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Verner Møller, April Henning, Leigh Robinson, Justine Allen, Mike McNamee, John Taylor, John Taylor, James H. Mills, Jesper Andreasson and Katherine McLean. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of the History of Sport, Sport in History, Soccer and Society, International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics and International Journal of Drug Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact