John H. Vine

22 papers receiving 344 citations

Peers

John H. Vine
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Equine 17
  • Small Animals 49
  • Toxicology 20
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 69
  • Spectroscopy 71
Replace James Scarth with:
James Scarth United Kingdom
Craig J. Suann Australia
Gary N. W. Leung China
D. S. McKemie United States
Roxana Moreira Portugal
C. R. Clark United States
Dennis K.J. Gorecki Canada
K. Roels Belgium
T J Weckman United States
Patricia Anielski Germany
John H. Vine relative to James Scarth United Kingdom James Scarth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
James Scarth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John H. Vine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John H. Vine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John H. Vine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John H. Vine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John H. Vine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John H. Vine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John H. Vine. The network helps show where John H. Vine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John H. Vine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John H. Vine Line = papers co-authored together John H. Vine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200160
2 201440
3 198736
4 198134
5 197931
6 198024
7 201321
8 199219
9 198318
10 201717
11 199117
12 198012
13 201510
14 20087
15 19876
16 20116
17 19875
18 19854
19 20222
20
The pharmcokinetics of equine medications
20122

About John H. Vine

John H. Vine is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Animal Science and Zoology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Small Animals, having authored 22 papers that have together received 373 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmacological Effects and Assays (4 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (3 papers), Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (3 papers), Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (3 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (2 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers) and Plant tissue culture and regeneration (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (17 citations), Small Animals (49 citations), Toxicology (20 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (69 citations) and Spectroscopy (71 citations). John H. Vine has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Michael G. Mullins, Rohan Steel, Vita Levina, Dominique Noiton, Julie A. Plummer, John Whitlam, Glenn A. Edwards, Garry A. Anderson, Ava M. Firth and T. R. Watson. Their work appears in journals such as Drug Testing and Analysis, Plant Growth Regulation, Accreditation and Quality Assurance, The Medical Journal of Australia and PLANT PHYSIOLOGY.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact