James Scarth
Impact in
-
- Hormonal and reproductive studies
- Animal Science and Zoology top 5%
- Pharmacological Effects and Assays
Papers in
-
- Hormonal and reproductive studies 27
-
- Pharmacological Effects and Assays 14
- Co-authors
- P. Teale (8 shared papers)Jack F. Kay (6 shared papers)Simon Hudson (3 shared papers)Philip Teale (5 shared papers)Tiia Kuuranne (1 shared paper)Clive M. Pearce (6 shared papers)Bruno Le Bizec (3 shared papers)Richard Houghton (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Drug Testing and Analysis (17 papers)Chromatographia (6 papers)Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics (3 papers)Steroids (3 papers)Food Additives & Contaminants Part A (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
James Scarth
35 papers receiving 466 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 320
- Animal Science and Zoology 161
- Equine 20
- Toxicology 35
- Cell Biology 119
Countries citing papers authored by James Scarth
This map shows the geographic impact of James Scarth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Scarth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Scarth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Scarth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Scarth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Scarth. The network helps show where James Scarth may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Scarth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 73 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 50 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 44 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 25 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 23 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 21 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 8 |
About James Scarth
James Scarth is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Animal Science and Zoology, Pharmacology, Cell Biology and Molecular Biology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 535 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hormonal and reproductive studies (27 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Assays (14 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (9 papers), Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment (7 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (6 papers), Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (6 papers), Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (3 papers) and Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (320 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (161 citations), Equine (20 citations), Toxicology (35 citations) and Cell Biology (119 citations). James Scarth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include P. Teale, Jack F. Kay, Simon Hudson, Philip Teale, Tiia Kuuranne, Clive M. Pearce, Bruno Le Bizec, Richard Houghton, Hubert De Brabander and Roy Macarthur. Their work appears in journals such as Drug Testing and Analysis, Chromatographia, Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Steroids and Food Additives & Contaminants Part A.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.