Countries where authors publish in Plant Growth Regulation
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Plant Growth Regulation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Plant Growth Regulation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Plant Growth Regulation more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Plant Growth Regulation
This network shows the impact of papers published in Plant Growth Regulation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Plant Growth Regulation.
About Plant Growth Regulation
The 3.8k papers published in Plant Growth Regulation in the last decades have received a total of 119.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Plant Growth Regulation usually cover Plant Science (3.4k papers), Molecular Biology (1.7k papers), Biotechnology (120 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (241 papers) and Agronomy and Crop Science (106 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (1.1k papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (795 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (724 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (445 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (390 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (385 papers), Seed Germination and Physiology (374 papers) and Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (330 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Plant Growth Regulation are Ching Huei Kao, William Cress, P.D. Hare, J. Martin-Tanguy, Mohamed A. El‐Tayeb, R. S. Dubey, F. Bangerth, A. Blum, N. L. Biddington and Małgorzata D. Gaj.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.