Plant Growth Regulation

3.7k papers and 101.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.7k papers published in Plant Growth Regulation in the last decades have received a total of 101.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Plant Growth Regulation usually cover Plant Science (3.3k papers), Molecular Biology (1.7k papers) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (240 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (1.0k papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (775 papers) and Plant tissue culture and regeneration (720 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Plant Growth Regulation are J. Van Staden, Ching Huei Kao, P.D. Hare, William Cress, J. Martin-Tanguy, David Schimel, Meinrat O. Andreae, Mohamed A. El‐Tayeb, R. S. Dubey and Jeffrey S. Amthor.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Plant Growth Regulation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Plant Growth Regulation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Plant Growth Regulation.

Countries where authors publish in Plant Growth Regulation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Plant Growth Regulation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Plant Growth Regulation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Plant Growth Regulation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025