John Forster

38 papers receiving 358 citations

Peers

John Forster
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Gender Studies 78
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 10
  • Public Administration 20
  • Sociology and Political Science 236
  • Economics and Econometrics 108
Replace Gordon M. Myers with:
Gordon M. Myers Canada
Nicole Ferdinand United Kingdom
Ogenyi Omar United Kingdom
Martin Holland New Zealand
Muhammad Asad Sadi Saudi Arabia
Vanja Vitezić Croatia
Linda Woo Hong Kong
Mohinder Chand India
Djeto Assané United States
Rocío Marco Crespo Spain
John Forster relative to Gordon M. Myers Canada Gordon M. Myers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Gordon M. Myers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Forster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Forster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Forster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Forster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Forster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Forster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Forster. The network helps show where John Forster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside John Forster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Forster Line = papers co-authored together John Forster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200670
2 196469
3 200437
4
The Political Economy of Global Sporting Organisations
200424
5 201923
6 201120
7 201419
8
Principles of Strategic Management
199619
9 201611
10 202011
11 197011
12 20029
13 19738
14
Budgetary management and control : the public sector in Australasia
19907
15 19737
16 20066
17 20165
18 19994
19 19924
20 19704

About John Forster

John Forster is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies, Finance and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 41 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (6 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (5 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Games (3 papers), Community Development and Social Impact (3 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (3 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (3 papers), Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (3 papers) and Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (78 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (10 citations), Public Administration (20 citations), Sociology and Political Science (236 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (108 citations). John Forster has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Sri Lanka. Frequent co-authors include Nigel Kenneth Pope, Michael Browne, Benjamín Liu, Louise P. King, Athula Naranpanawa, Eliyathamby A. Selvanathan, John Wanna, Geoff Harris, Helen Higgs and Austin L. Porterfield. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Comparative Sociology, American Sociological Review, Papers of the Regional Science Association, European Journal of Development Research and Anticancer Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact