John E. Morley

525 citations
13 papers · 468 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

John E. Morley

12 papers receiving 451 citations

Peers

John E. Morley
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 129
  • Physiology 187
  • Sensory Systems 34
  • Biological Psychiatry 13
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 16
Replace John E. Morley with:
John E. Morley United States
Beatriz C. Borges Brazil
Khristofor Agassandian United States
Susana I. Sá Portugal
Agnieszka Baranowska-Bik Poland
Min‐Tsai Liu United States
Macarena Vergara United States
Rachel N. Lippert Germany
Paulo J.F. Martins Brazil
John E. Morley relative to John E. Morley United States John E. Morley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
John E. Morley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Morley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Morley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Morley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Morley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Morley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Morley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Morley. The network helps show where John E. Morley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Morley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Morley Line = papers co-authored together John E. Morley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 199293
2 198786
3 199360
4 199557
5 199649
6 199843
7 199838
8 199215
9 199510
10 199310
11 19906
12 19961
13 20120

About John E. Morley

John E. Morley is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 13 papers that have together received 468 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (2 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (2 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (2 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (2 papers) and Nutrition and Health in Aging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (129 citations), Physiology (187 citations), Sensory Systems (34 citations), Biological Psychiatry (13 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (16 citations). John E. Morley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include James F. Flood, Fran E. Kaiser, Arshag D. Mooradian, Mark J. Rosenthal, Dennis T. Villareal, Vijaya B. Kumar, Kayoko Uezu, Michael B. Mattammal, Ping Patrick and Horace M. Perry. Their work appears in journals such as Life Sciences, Neurobiology of Aging, European Journal of Pharmacology, Drugs & Aging and The American Journal of Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact