Jay Clayton

626 citations
52 papers · 192 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Jay Clayton

37 papers receiving 101 citations

Peers

Jay Clayton
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Literature and Literary Theory 66
  • Philosophy 28
  • Cultural Studies 16
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 9
  • Music 5
Replace James Berger with:
James Berger United States
Seán Burke United States
Robert Weisbuch United States
Philip Swanson United Kingdom
Barbara Godard Canada
Marianne Novy United States
Thomas Foster United Kingdom
SHEILA M. SMITH United Kingdom
Benjamin Reiss United States
Juan Eduardo Cirlot
Jay Clayton relative to James Berger United States James Berger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
James Berger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay Clayton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay Clayton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay Clayton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay Clayton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay Clayton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay Clayton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay Clayton. The network helps show where Jay Clayton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Jay Clayton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay Clayton Line = papers co-authored together Jay Clayton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200323
2 199717
3 198914
4 199112
5
Music for 18 musicians
19788
6 19907
7 20136
8 20216
9 20026
10 20076
11 20166
12
Genetics in Film and TV, 1912-2020.
20216
13 19945
14 19875
15 20075
16
Chekhov then and now : the reception of Chekhov in world culture
19974
17 19934
18 19904
19
Poetica Slavica : studies in honour of Zbigniew Folejewski
19813
20 19873

About Jay Clayton

Jay Clayton is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Anthropology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 192 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Science Education and Perceptions (8 papers), Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies (6 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (5 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (4 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (4 papers), European Linguistics and Anthropology (3 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (3 papers) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (66 citations), Philosophy (28 citations), Cultural Studies (16 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (9 citations) and Music (5 citations). Jay Clayton has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Margery Sabin, John E. Bowlt, Priscilla Wald, Elizabeth R. Arnold, Steve Reich, Rebecca Armstrong, Michael C. Shapiro, A. C. Bradley, Betsy Draine and Ellen Wright Clayton. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Slavonic Papers, The Slavic and East European Journal, Nineteenth-Century Literature, Medical Humanities and American Literature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact