The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review

281 papers and 617 indexed citations i.

About

The 281 papers published in The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review in the last decades have received a total of 617 indexed citations. Papers published in The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review usually cover Political Science and International Relations (149 papers), Sociology and Political Science (99 papers) and History (14 papers) specifically the topics of Soviet and Russian History (58 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (42 papers) and Russia and Soviet political economy (34 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review are Elizabeth A. Wood, Stephen K. Wegren, Peter H. Solomon, Ellen Mickiewicz, Joel Moses, Victor Zaslavsky, Alfred B. Evans, Richard Sakwa, Nikolai M. Dronin and Serhy Yekelchyk.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review.

Countries where authors publish in The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025