John Demos
Impact in
- History top 0.5%
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
- General Psychology top 5%
Papers in
-
- Archaeology and Natural History 7
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 7
- Co-authors
- Kai Erikson (1 shared paper)Robert Middlekauff (1 shared paper)Philip Greven (4 shared papers)Kenneth A. Lockridge (5 shared papers)Michael McGiffert (1 shared paper)John J. Waters (1 shared paper)W. Andrew Achenbaum (1 shared paper)Alan M. Taylor (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The William and Mary Quarterly (12 papers)The American Historical Review (9 papers)The New England Quarterly (5 papers)Journal of American History (5 papers)The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John Demos
56 papers receiving 1.0k citations
John Demos's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- History 224
- General Psychology 26
- Sociology and Political Science 724
- Archeology 17
- Anthropology 144
Countries citing papers authored by John Demos
This map shows the geographic impact of John Demos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Demos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Demos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Demos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Demos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Demos. The network helps show where John Demos may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Demos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wayward Puritans: A Study in the Sociology of Deviance Hit paper breakdown → | 1968 | 399 |
| 2 | 1970 | 191 | |
| 3 | 1969 | 170 | |
| 4 | 1970 | 105 | |
| 5 | 1987 | 70 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 65 | |
| 7 | 1983 | 56 | |
| 8 | 1984 | 56 | |
| 9 | 1980 | 47 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 22 | |
| 11 | 1987 | 20 | |
| 12 | 1995 | 20 | |
| 13 | 1987 | 17 | |
| 14 | 1978 | 17 | |
| 15 | 1971 | 16 | |
| 16 | 1968 | 16 | |
| 17 | 1964 | 15 | |
| 18 | 1965 | 15 | |
| 19 | 1970 | 15 | |
| 20 | 2001 | 14 |
About John Demos
John Demos is a scholar working on Anthropology, Economics and Econometrics, History, Sociology and Political Science and Philosophy, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (7 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (7 papers), Mormonism, Religion, and History (5 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (4 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (4 papers), American History and Culture (3 papers), Canadian Identity and History (3 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (224 citations), General Psychology (26 citations), Sociology and Political Science (724 citations), Archeology (17 citations) and Anthropology (144 citations). John Demos has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kai Erikson, Robert Middlekauff, Philip Greven, Kenneth A. Lockridge, Michael McGiffert, John J. Waters, W. Andrew Achenbaum, Alan M. Taylor, Robert V. Wells and Daniel Scott Smith. Their work appears in journals such as The William and Mary Quarterly, The American Historical Review, The New England Quarterly, Journal of American History and The Journal of Interdisciplinary History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.