John Chandler

147 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Peers

John Chandler
Comparison fields: 5 of 174
  • Plant Science 2.3k
  • Ophthalmology 411
  • Public Administration 115
  • Molecular Biology 2.0k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 505
Replace Robert L. Burton with:
Robert L. Burton United States
Catherine Gérard Belgium
Michael Schümann Germany
David R. Karp United States
Xiao‐Ping Chen China
Paul Quinton United States
Peter Collins United Kingdom
Gary Stein United States
Clare Williams United Kingdom
Kenneth D. Brown United Kingdom
John Chandler relative to Robert L. Burton United States Robert L. Burton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.4×
Robert L. Burton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Chandler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Chandler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Chandler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Chandler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Chandler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Chandler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Chandler. The network helps show where John Chandler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Chandler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Chandler Line = papers co-authored together John Chandler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 153 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000300
2 2015236
3 2002182
4 1982182
5 2007154
6 2009144
7 2015103
8 201099
9 199698
10 198397
11 200978
12
Immunology of the mycoses. I. Depressed lymphocyte transformation in chronic histoplasmosis.
196878
13 201776
14 201176
15 199172
16 200871
17 201270
18 200869
19 197469
20
Chronic mucocutaneous moniliasis with impaired delayed hypersensitivity.
197069

About John Chandler

John Chandler is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 153 papers that have together received 4.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Molecular Biology Research (44 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (33 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (21 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (20 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (17 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (12 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (9 papers) and Ocular Infections and Treatments (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (2.3k citations), Ophthalmology (411 citations), Public Administration (115 citations), Molecular Biology (2.0k citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (505 citations). John Chandler has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang Werr, Thomas E. Gillette, Jim Barry, Melanie Cole, Siegbert Melzer, Klaus Apel, Elisabeth Berg, Heather Clark, Jack V. Greiner and Herbert E. Kaufman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Botany, Trends in Plant Science, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Plant Molecular Biology and Planta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact