John C. Wright

52 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

John C. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Virology 257
  • Literature and Literary Theory 304
  • Gender Studies 242
  • Education 654
  • Communication 126
Replace Kentaro Fujita with:
Kentaro Fujita United States
Mary Renck Jalongo United States
Thomas E. Malloy United States
Rachel Cohen United States
John Coleman United Kingdom
Mabel L. Rice United States
Arnold B. Arluke United States
Helen Cheng United Kingdom
John S. P. Tulloch United Kingdom
Ron Friedman United States
John C. Wright relative to Kentaro Fujita United States Kentaro Fujita's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.9×
Kentaro Fujita · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John C. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Wright. The network helps show where John C. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John C. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John C. Wright Line = papers co-authored together John C. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999176
2 1994165
3 1994117
4 199195
5 198389
6 197972
7 200371
8 198068
9
Severe attacks by dogs: characteristics of the dogs, the victims, and the attack settings.
198565
10 199162
11 198355
12 199552
13 200846
14 197439
15 199138
16 198932
17 196531
18 198729
19 198228
20 198227

About John C. Wright

John C. Wright is a scholar working on Education, Literature and Literary Theory, Virology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Communication, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Development and Digital Technology (23 papers), Media Influence and Health (7 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (7 papers), Rabies epidemiology and control (6 papers), Psychological and Educational Research Studies (6 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (6 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (4 papers) and Social Media and Politics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (257 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (304 citations), Gender Studies (242 citations), Education (654 citations) and Communication (126 citations). John C. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Aletha C. Huston, Jeffrey J. Sacks, Kenneth A. Gershman, Samuel B. Green, Janet G. Marquis, Aletha Huston-Stein, Sandra L. Calvert, Marguerite A. Fitch, Valerie Binney and Michelle St. Peters. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Psychology, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Child Development, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology and Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact