John C. Gant

1.6k citations
23 papers · 1.3k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

John C. Gant

21 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

John C. Gant
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Neurology 343
  • Biological Psychiatry 83
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 569
  • Developmental Neuroscience 101
  • Aging 36
Replace Scott J. Webster with:
Scott J. Webster United States
Kiren Ubhi United States
Ana Ricobaraza Spain
David Virley United Kingdom
Jean‐Christophe Houzel Brazil
Juan Carlos López Spain
Michael S. Perkinton United Kingdom
Tomoyuki Nishizaki Japan
Fabien Delerue Australia
Misha Zilberter United States
John C. Gant relative to Scott J. Webster United States Scott J. Webster's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Scott J. Webster · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John C. Gant

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Gant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Gant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Gant more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Gant

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Gant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Gant. The network helps show where John C. Gant may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John C. Gant, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John C. Gant Line = papers co-authored together John C. Gant links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007315
2 2012249
3 2006154
4 2009134
5 200879
6 201573
7 201552
8 201149
9 201036
10 201331
11 201730
12 201629
13 200829
14 201722
15 202318
16 202013
17 201811
18 20208
19
Meningitis due to Listeria monocytogenes: case report.
19563
20 20252

About John C. Gant

John C. Gant is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (9 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (9 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (4 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (2 papers), Nuclear Receptors and Signaling (2 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (2 papers), Signaling Pathways in Disease (2 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (343 citations), Biological Psychiatry (83 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (569 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (101 citations) and Aging (36 citations). John C. Gant has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Olivier Thibault, Philip W. Landfield, Eric M. Blalock, Nada M. Porter, Christopher M. Norris, Inga Kadish, Adam D. Bachstetter, Linda J. Van Eldik, M. Paul Murphy and Jennifer L. Furman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and The FASEB Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact