John Bone

33 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers

John Bone
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • General Decision Sciences 72
  • Safety Research 97
  • Finance 74
  • Urban Studies 23
  • Economics and Econometrics 100
Replace Mark Kelman with:
Mark Kelman United States
Ian Carter Italy
Hillel Steiner United Kingdom
Lasse Steiner Switzerland
Gillian Brock New Zealand
Philip Jones United Kingdom
Katarina Nordblom Sweden
Joachim Prinz Germany
Liam Murphy United States
Richard A. Couto United States
John Bone relative to Mark Kelman United States Mark Kelman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Mark Kelman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Bone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Bone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Bone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Bone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Bone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Bone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Bone. The network helps show where John Bone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Bone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Bone Line = papers co-authored together John Bone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199973
2 201443
3 201035
4 200726
5 200624
6 200619
7 200318
8
Nature: Critical Concepts in the Social Sciences
200518
9 201017
10 199811
11 201210
12 201810
13 200310
14
The significance of class
20069
15
The Social Map & the Problem of Order: A Re-evaluation of ‘Homo Sociologicus'
20059
16 20128
17 20067
18 20166
19 20166
20 20144

About John Bone

John Bone is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, General Decision Sciences and General Health Professions, having authored 38 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (6 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (5 papers), Economic theories and models (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (3 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers) and Auction Theory and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (72 citations), Safety Research (97 citations), Finance (74 citations), Urban Studies (23 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (100 citations). John Bone has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and France. Frequent co-authors include John Suckling, John D. Hey, David Inglis, Karen O’Reilly, Rhoda Wilkie, Stephen S. O’Connor, Angela Shields, Jo Ellen Wilson, Wei Pang and Stephen E. Nicolson. Their work appears in journals such as Sociological Research Online, British Journal of Sociology, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Sociology Compass and Work Employment and Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact