Liam Murphy

2.6k citations
32 papers · 1.3k · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Liam Murphy

29 papers receiving 864 citations

Peers

Liam Murphy
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Philosophy 391
  • Political Science and International Relations 750
  • Law 207
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 206
  • Economics and Econometrics 272
Replace Hillel Steiner with:
Hillel Steiner United Kingdom
George P. Fletcher United States
Laura Valentini United Kingdom
Donald H. Regan United States
A. W. Brian Simpson United States
Christian Barry Australia
Chandran Kukathas Australia
Francis Canavan United States
Andrew Williams United Kingdom
Randy E. Barnett United States
Liam Murphy relative to Hillel Steiner United Kingdom Hillel Steiner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Hillel Steiner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Liam Murphy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liam Murphy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liam Murphy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liam Murphy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liam Murphy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liam Murphy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liam Murphy. The network helps show where Liam Murphy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Liam Murphy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Liam Murphy Line = papers co-authored together Liam Murphy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002351
2 1998247
3 2000210
4
The Myth of Ownership: Taxes and Justice
2002133
5
The demands of beneficence
199373
6
The Concept and the Rule of Law
200869
7 200159
8 200120
9 202018
10 200117
11 199714
12 201813
13 201913
14 201412
15 20147
16 20036
17 19954
18 20024
19 20013
20 20173

About Liam Murphy

Liam Murphy is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Law, Philosophy and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal and Constitutional Studies (5 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (5 papers), Free Will and Agency (5 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (5 papers), Legal principles and applications (5 papers), Taxation and Compliance Studies (4 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (4 papers) and Law in Society and Culture (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (391 citations), Political Science and International Relations (750 citations), Law (207 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (206 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (272 citations). Liam Murphy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Nagel, Thaddeus Metz, Jules L. Coleman, Andrei Marmor, Jeremy Waldron, Brian Leiter, Mitchell E. Berman, Tom Campbell, Ronald Dworkin and Julie Dixon. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy & Public Affairs, The Philosophical Review, Economics and Philosophy, European Journal of International Law and British Journal of Industrial Relations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact