Désirée Lie

79 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Désirée Lie
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 272
  • Family Practice 54
  • General Health Professions 623
  • Emergency Medical Services 133
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 473
Replace Cynthia Whitehead with:
Cynthia Whitehead Canada
Maria Arman Sweden
Alireza Nikbakht Nasrabadi Iran
Thomas R. Freeman Canada
Iman Sharif United States
Jeffrey Borkan United States
Lynne Robins United States
L.M.L. Ong Netherlands
Joseph A. Carrese United States
Mark Goldszmidt Canada
Désirée Lie relative to Cynthia Whitehead Canada Cynthia Whitehead's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Cynthia Whitehead · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Désirée Lie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Désirée Lie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Désirée Lie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Désirée Lie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Désirée Lie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Désirée Lie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Désirée Lie. The network helps show where Désirée Lie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Désirée Lie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Désirée Lie Line = papers co-authored together Désirée Lie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010272
2 2004166
3 201379
4 200675
5 201265
6 200663
7
Use of an objective structured clinical examination in evaluating student performance.
199860
8 201359
9 200658
10 200858
11 201253
12 201644
13 200940
14 201639
15 201539
16 201838
17 201238
18 200837
19 201035
20 200134

About Désirée Lie

Désirée Lie is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, Psychiatry and Mental health and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 81 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (14 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (13 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (11 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (9 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (8 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (7 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (4 papers) and Social Media in Health Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (272 citations), Family Practice (54 citations), General Health Professions (623 citations), Emergency Medical Services (133 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (473 citations). Désirée Lie has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Russia. Frequent co-authors include John Boker, Johanna Shapiro, Sylvia Bereknyei Merrell, Clarence H. Braddock, Elizabeth T. Lee-Rey, Kevin Lohenry, Christopher P. Forest, Felicia Cohn, Michael D. Prislin and Terry Kind. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Education Online, The Journal of Physician Assistant Education, Academic Medicine, BMC Medical Education and Medical Teacher.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact