John Barr

419 citations
38 papers · 300 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

John Barr

36 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers

John Barr
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Computer Science Applications 184
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 76
  • Information Systems 126
  • Communication 24
  • Media Technology 27
Replace Yen‐Teh Hsia with:
Yen‐Teh Hsia Taiwan
Charles Patton United States
Jason Cole United States
Elizabeth Patitsas Canada
Christian Köppe Netherlands
Brian R. von Konsky Australia
Hyeonjin Kim South Korea
Tony Greening Australia
Tony Jenkins United Kingdom
Ilona Box Australia
John Barr relative to Yen‐Teh Hsia Taiwan Yen‐Teh Hsia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Yen‐Teh Hsia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Barr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Barr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Barr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Barr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Barr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Barr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Barr. The network helps show where John Barr may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Barr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Barr Line = papers co-authored together John Barr links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201548
2 201347
3 201734
4 201721
5 201220
6 201220
7 199413
8 199711
9 202210
10 201010
11 20235
12 19945
13 20215
14 20215
15 20135
16 20114
17 20194
18 20163
19 20203
20 19993

About John Barr

John Barr is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Information Systems, Education and Communication, having authored 38 papers that have together received 300 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (13 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (7 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (5 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (4 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (4 papers), Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (3 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (3 papers) and Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (184 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (76 citations), Information Systems (126 citations), Communication (24 citations) and Media Technology (27 citations). John Barr has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Tony Clear, Michael Goldweber, John Noll, Sarah Beecham, Michael J. Oudshoorn, Mats Daniels, Elizabeth Patitsas, Renzo Davoli, Samuel Mann and Herschel Rabitz. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Software, Risk Analysis, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification and Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact