John Barr

426 citations
42 papers · 320 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

John Barr

36 papers receiving 301 citations

Peers

John Barr
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Computer Science Applications 192
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 80
  • Information Systems 128
  • Communication 27
  • Media Technology 28
Replace Anne Nortcliffe with:
Anne Nortcliffe United Kingdom
Jason Cole United States
Christian Köppe Netherlands
Dianne P. Chambers Australia
Brian R. von Konsky Australia
Nick Z. Zacharis Greece
Kevin Buffardi United States
Elizabeth Patitsas Canada
Giovanni Fulantelli Italy
Alex Radermacher United States
John Barr relative to Anne Nortcliffe United Kingdom Anne Nortcliffe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Anne Nortcliffe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Barr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Barr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Barr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Barr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Barr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Barr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Barr. The network helps show where John Barr may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Barr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Barr Line = papers co-authored together John Barr links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201349
2 201549
3 201737
4 201224
5 201722
6 201221
7 199413
8 199711
9 201011
10 202210
11 20236
12 20216
13 20215
14 19945
15 20115
16 20135
17 20195
18 20154
19 20123
20 20203

About John Barr

John Barr is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Information Systems, Education and Communication, having authored 42 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (13 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (7 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (5 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (4 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (4 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (3 papers), Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (3 papers) and Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (192 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (80 citations), Information Systems (128 citations), Communication (27 citations) and Media Technology (28 citations). John Barr has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Tony Clear, Michael Goldweber, John Noll, Sarah Beecham, Mats Daniels, Michael J. Oudshoorn, Elizabeth Patitsas, Renzo Davoli, Samuel Mann and Herschel Rabitz. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, Risk Analysis, IEEE Software, SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification and Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact