John A. Bower

982 citations
32 papers · 637 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

John A. Bower

30 papers receiving 577 citations

Peers

John A. Bower
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 34
  • Food Science 341
  • Marketing 115
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 161
  • Animal Science and Zoology 101
Replace Lynda M. O’Neill with:
Lynda M. O’Neill Switzerland
D. M. H. THOMSON United Kingdom
Renata Januszewska Belgium
Denize Cristine Rodrigues de Oliveira Brazil
N.J.N. Yau Taiwan
Sara De Pelsmaeker Belgium
Terhi A. Pohjanheimo Finland
Elizabeth Carrillo Spain
Géraldine Enderli France
Hollis Ashman Australia
John A. Bower relative to Lynda M. O’Neill Switzerland Lynda M. O’Neill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Lynda M. O’Neill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John A. Bower

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John A. Bower's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John A. Bower with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John A. Bower more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John A. Bower

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John A. Bower. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John A. Bower. The network helps show where John A. Bower may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside John A. Bower, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John A. Bower Line = papers co-authored together John A. Bower links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002197
2 200364
3 200059
4 199924
5 200722
6 200122
7 200021
8 200020
9 200820
10 200318
11 201316
12 200916
13 199815
14 199814
15
Statistical Methods for Food Science: Introductory procedures for the food practitioner
200914
16 200214
17 198910
18 199510
19 20009
20 20039

About John A. Bower

John A. Bower is a scholar working on Food Science, Animal Science and Zoology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Analytical Chemistry and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 32 papers that have together received 637 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (16 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (8 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (7 papers), Culinary Culture and Tourism (5 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (5 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (4 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (3 papers) and Organic Food and Agriculture (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (34 citations), Food Science (341 citations), Marketing (115 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (161 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (101 citations). John A. Bower has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Monika J. A. Schröder, Irene A. Baxter, Amy L. Davidson, CLAIRE E.A. SEAMAN, Mark A Fleming and Jessica J. A. Ferguson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Sensory Studies, International Journal of Consumer Studies, Food Quality and Preference, British Food Journal and Journal of Advertising Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact