Johan Verbeeck

1.8k citations
52 papers · 538 · h-index 15

Impact in

  • Equine top 5%
    • Veterinary Equine Medical Research
    • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
    • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
    • Statistical Methods and Inference

Papers in

Johan Verbeeck

44 papers receiving 519 citations

Peers

Johan Verbeeck
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Equine 41
  • Statistics and Probability 100
  • Anatomy 15
  • Modeling and Simulation 12
  • Ceramics and Composites 15
Replace Sarah Malek with:
Sarah Malek United States
Hüseyin Yılmaz Türkiye
Gabriele Lasczkowski Germany
U. Feldmann Germany
Gea A. Holtman Netherlands
Martyn R. Smith United States
Michael M. Chan United States
Dingmei Zhang China
Rhonda Roberts United States
Hao Ying China
Johan Verbeeck relative to Sarah Malek United States Sarah Malek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.7×
Sarah Malek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Johan Verbeeck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Johan Verbeeck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan Verbeeck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan Verbeeck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Johan Verbeeck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan Verbeeck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan Verbeeck. The network helps show where Johan Verbeeck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Johan Verbeeck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Johan Verbeeck Line = papers co-authored together Johan Verbeeck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201760
2 202144
3 201535
4 202232
5 202031
6 202030
7 202024
8 199723
9 199621
10 201919
11 202019
12 200917
13 202114
14 202214
15 202214
16 202213
17 202211
18 201211
19 202010
20 202110

About Johan Verbeeck

Johan Verbeeck is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Genetics, Pharmacology, Materials Chemistry and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 52 papers that have together received 538 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (12 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (9 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (4 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (4 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (4 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (3 papers) and Skin and Cellular Biology Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (41 citations), Statistics and Probability (100 citations), Anatomy (15 citations), Modeling and Simulation (12 citations) and Ceramics and Composites (15 citations). Johan Verbeeck has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include F. Verschooten, Geert Molenberghs, Jorge E. Esteves, Francesco Cerritelli, Patrick L.S. van Dun, William N. Anderson, Bo Huang, David C. Hoaglin, Duolao Wang and Gaohong Dong. Their work appears in journals such as Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, PLoS ONE, Biometrics, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics and Statistics in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact