Thomas Neyens

42 papers receiving 412 citations

Peers

Thomas Neyens
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Modeling and Simulation 75
  • Ecological Modeling 41
  • Statistics and Probability 68
  • Health 45
  • Ecology 68
Replace Carolina Perez‐Heydrich with:
Carolina Perez‐Heydrich United States
Fabio Divino Italy
Alastair Rushworth United Kingdom
Manabi Paul India
Mark J. Meyer United States
Gianfranco Lovison Italy
Carmen L. Vidal Rodeiro United Kingdom
Marcos O. Prates Brazil
Owen Lyne United Kingdom
Mark Cresswell United Kingdom
Thomas Neyens relative to Carolina Perez‐Heydrich United States Carolina Perez‐Heydrich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Carolina Perez‐Heydrich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Neyens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Neyens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Neyens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Neyens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Neyens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Neyens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Neyens. The network helps show where Thomas Neyens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Neyens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Neyens Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Neyens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201936
2 201835
3 202130
4 201427
5 201425
6 201123
7 202219
8 202018
9 202018
10 202018
11 201417
12 201616
13 201214
14 201312
15 202311
16 202110
17 20199
18 20218
19 20227
20 20217

About Thomas Neyens

Thomas Neyens is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Modeling and Simulation, Statistics and Probability, Epidemiology and Ecology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 epidemiological studies (14 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (13 papers), Spatial and Panel Data Analysis (11 papers), Data-Driven Disease Surveillance (9 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (7 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (6 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (5 papers) and COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (75 citations), Ecological Modeling (41 citations), Statistics and Probability (68 citations), Health (45 citations) and Ecology (68 citations). Thomas Neyens has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Christel Faes, Geert Molenberghs, Tom Artois, Geert Verbeke, Natalie Beenaerts, Wondwosen Kassahun, Karen Smeets, Ruben Evens, Niel Hens and Koen Pepermans. Their work appears in journals such as Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology, Scientific Reports, PLoS ONE, Statistics in Medicine and Vaccine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact