Christel Faes

6.6k citations
228 papers · 4.0k · h-index 34

Impact in

Papers in

Christel Faes

217 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

Christel Faes
Comparison fields: 5 of 183
  • Modeling and Simulation 880
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 280
  • Statistics and Probability 403
  • Infectious Diseases 583
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 315
Replace Marc Aerts with:
Marc Aerts Belgium
David L. Buckeridge Canada
Niel Hens Belgium
Ted Cohen United States
André Charlett United Kingdom
Emma S. McBryde Australia
Eduardo Massad Brazil
Ben S. Cooper United Kingdom
David N. Fisman Canada
Peter Horby United Kingdom
Christel Faes relative to Marc Aerts Belgium Marc Aerts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Marc Aerts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christel Faes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christel Faes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christel Faes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christel Faes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christel Faes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christel Faes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christel Faes. The network helps show where Christel Faes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christel Faes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christel Faes Line = papers co-authored together Christel Faes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 228 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020364
2 2011211
3 2020150
4 2006145
5 2011119
6 201286
7 200983
8 200781
9 201175
10 201175
11 201375
12 201573
13 200971
14 200562
15 202153
16 202153
17 201151
18 201150
19 202150
20 201449

About Christel Faes

Christel Faes is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Modeling and Simulation, Epidemiology, Economics and Econometrics and Infectious Diseases, having authored 228 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 epidemiological studies (58 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (50 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (19 papers), Data-Driven Disease Surveillance (18 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (17 papers), Spatial and Panel Data Analysis (15 papers), Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (14 papers) and Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (880 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (280 citations), Statistics and Probability (403 citations), Infectious Diseases (583 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (315 citations). Christel Faes has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Uganda. Frequent co-authors include Niel Hens, Marc Aerts, Geert Molenberghs, Philippe Beutels, Tapiwa Ganyani, Jacco Wallinga, Andrea Torneri, Cécile Kremer, Dongxuan Chen and Herman Goossens. Their work appears in journals such as Statistics in Medicine, Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology, BMC Public Health, PLoS ONE and Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact