Jodi G. Daniel

10 papers receiving 647 citations

Peers

Jodi G. Daniel
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Family Practice 169
  • Health Information Management 101
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 45
  • Medical Terminology 2
  • Health Informatics 10
Replace Elisha M. Friesema with:
Elisha M. Friesema United States
Diane Hauser United States
Joanne Callen Australia
Koren Hyogene Kwag Italy
Ehsan Nabovati Iran
Bill G. Felkey United States
Julie Li Australia
Fabienne Bourgeois United States
Ana L. Hincapie United States
Asta Sorensen United States
Jodi G. Daniel relative to Elisha M. Friesema United States Elisha M. Friesema's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Elisha M. Friesema · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jodi G. Daniel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jodi G. Daniel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jodi G. Daniel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jodi G. Daniel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jodi G. Daniel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jodi G. Daniel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jodi G. Daniel. The network helps show where Jodi G. Daniel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Jodi G. Daniel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jodi G. Daniel Line = papers co-authored together Jodi G. Daniel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2011318
2 2013218
3 201847
4 201833
5
Re: Request for Comment: Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA): Request for Comments on the Development of a Risk-Based Regulatory Framework and Strategy for Health Information Technology
201319
6 201316
7 20198
8 20096
9 20132
10 20112
11
Addressing Liability and Clinical Decision Support: A Federal Government Role
20120

About Jodi G. Daniel

Jodi G. Daniel is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Automotive Engineering, Health Information Management, Artificial Intelligence and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 11 papers that have together received 669 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety (2 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (2 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (2 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper), Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems (1 paper) and Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (169 citations), Health Information Management (101 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (45 citations), Medical Terminology (2 citations) and Health Informatics (10 citations). Jodi G. Daniel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Farzad Mostashari, Judy Murphy, M. L. Johnson, Christopher B. Granger, Hayden B. Bosworth, P. Michael Ho, Bradi B. Granger, Larry Z. Liu, William H. Shrank and Rebecca Burkholder. Their work appears in journals such as Health Affairs, JAMA Network Open, American Heart Journal, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association and Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact