Phil Mendys

19 papers receiving 916 citations

Peers

Phil Mendys
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Family Practice 329
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 151
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 205
  • Economics and Econometrics 179
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 100
Replace Al‐Motassem Yousef with:
Al‐Motassem Yousef Jordan
Robert Guthrie United States
Antonio Gimeno‐Miguel Spain
Mary Loverde United States
Stephen Kogut United States
Bradley R. Williams United States
Olga Laosa Spain
Lucas Van Bortel Belgium
Mohd Makmor‐Bakry Malaysia
Margaret Bermingham Australia
Phil Mendys relative to Al‐Motassem Yousef Jordan Al‐Motassem Yousef's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Al‐Motassem Yousef · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phil Mendys

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phil Mendys's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phil Mendys with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phil Mendys more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phil Mendys

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phil Mendys. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phil Mendys. The network helps show where Phil Mendys may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phil Mendys, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phil Mendys Line = papers co-authored together Phil Mendys links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2011316
2 2001225
3 2010104
4 201561
5 201651
6 201633
7 201722
8 200820
9 201320
10 201819
11 201416
12 201313
13 201811
14 20109
15 20106
16 20223
17 20212
18
Abstract 1479: The Effects of Computerized Referral and In-Hospital Visit on Local Compared to Statewide Cardiac Rehabilitation Enrollment
20091
19 20211

About Phil Mendys

Phil Mendys is a scholar working on Family Practice, Economics and Econometrics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 933 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medication Adherence and Compliance (7 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (5 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (5 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (4 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (3 papers) and Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (329 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (151 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (205 citations), Economics and Econometrics (179 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (100 citations). Phil Mendys has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Judith L. Treadway, Dennis J. Hoover, Ross J. Simpson, Hayden B. Bosworth, Bradi B. Granger, Christopher B. Granger, P. Michael Ho, Rebecca Burkholder, Leah L. Zullig and Jodi G. Daniel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of clinical lipidology, Patient Education and Counseling, Patient Preference and Adherence, Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy and Circulation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact