Jo‐Anne Chuck

21 papers receiving 293 citations

Peers

Jo‐Anne Chuck
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Pharmacology 123
  • Biotechnology 37
  • Molecular Biology 156
  • Biochemistry 10
  • Microbiology 1
Replace Elisa Herawati with:
Elisa Herawati Indonesia
Magdalena Świątek Poland
Kenneth D. Clevenger United States
Guido Melzer Germany
Richard Kerkman Netherlands
Edna Bode Germany
William R. Farmer United States
Cathleen A. Cantwell United States
Christina Dauth Germany
Asfarul S. Haque India
Jo‐Anne Chuck relative to Elisa Herawati Indonesia Elisa Herawati's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Elisa Herawati · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jo‐Anne Chuck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo‐Anne Chuck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo‐Anne Chuck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo‐Anne Chuck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo‐Anne Chuck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo‐Anne Chuck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo‐Anne Chuck. The network helps show where Jo‐Anne Chuck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jo‐Anne Chuck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jo‐Anne Chuck Line = papers co-authored together Jo‐Anne Chuck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200386
2 199737
3 199431
4
Examination of the conjunctival microbiota after 8 hours of eye closure.
199523
5 200319
6 199618
7 201316
8 201413
9 199011
10 20118
11 19958
12 20058
13 20126
14 20046
15 20064
16 20084
17 19942
18 20152
19 20102
20
WIL in Science: Leadership for WIL Final project report 2015 – 2016
20162

About Jo‐Anne Chuck

Jo‐Anne Chuck is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Molecular Biology, Education, Plant Science and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 22 papers that have together received 307 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (7 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (3 papers), Higher Education Learning Practices (2 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (2 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (2 papers), Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (2 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (2 papers) and Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (123 citations), Biotechnology (37 citations), Molecular Biology (156 citations), Biochemistry (10 citations) and Microbiology (1 citation). Jo‐Anne Chuck has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Kevin D. Barrow, Jasmina Nikodinović‐Runić, T. J. Millar, David E. Cane, Chaitan Khosla, Penny von Wettstein‐Knowles, Hai Huang, Johan G. Olsen, Michael J. McPherson and John R. Jacobsen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Science Education and Technology, Current Microbiology, BioTechniques, Journal of Microencapsulation and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact