Joan E. Backman

792 citations
19 papers · 699 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Joan E. Backman

18 papers receiving 618 citations

Peers

Joan E. Backman
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 509
  • Statistics and Probability 191
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 225
  • Clinical Psychology 166
  • Education 187
Replace Eleanor M. Semel with:
Eleanor M. Semel United States
Carmen Cattaneo Italy
Elaine R. Silliman United States
Dorothy J. Feeman United States
Barbara Culatta United States
Saskia Kohnen Australia
Russell Matthews Australia
Katharina Galuschka Germany
James E. Nation United States
Emily Lamont United Kingdom
Joan E. Backman relative to Eleanor M. Semel United States Eleanor M. Semel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.0×
Eleanor M. Semel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joan E. Backman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joan E. Backman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan E. Backman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan E. Backman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joan E. Backman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan E. Backman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan E. Backman. The network helps show where Joan E. Backman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Joan E. Backman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joan E. Backman Line = papers co-authored together Joan E. Backman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1984184
2 1991142
3 1984125
4 198554
5 198353
6
Effectiveness of the Lindamood Auditory Discrimination in Depth Program with Students with Learning Disabilities.
199326
7 198624
8 198721
9 198613
10 198613
11 197912
12 19869
13 19958
14 19865
15 19845
16 19873
17 19801
18 19891
19 20240

About Joan E. Backman

Joan E. Backman is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Statistics and Probability and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 19 papers that have together received 699 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (6 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (4 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (4 papers), Language Development and Disorders (3 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (2 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers) and Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (509 citations), Statistics and Probability (191 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (225 citations), Clinical Psychology (166 citations) and Education (187 citations). Joan E. Backman has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark S. Seidenberg, Margaret Bruck, Martine Hébert, H. Bruce Ferguson, Harry N. Bawden, Joseph M. Dooley, Peter Camfield, Joseph M. Byrne, Isabel M. Smith and Kenneth W. Dunn. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Applied Psycholinguistics, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology and Journal of Pediatric Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact