Joan E. Backman

790 citations
18 papers · 640 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Joan E. Backman

16 papers receiving 575 citations

Peers

Joan E. Backman
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 479
  • Statistics and Probability 174
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 229
  • Clinical Psychology 150
  • Education 178
Replace Carmen Cattaneo with:
Carmen Cattaneo Italy
Russell Matthews Australia
Dorothy J. Feeman United States
Barbara Culatta United States
Eleanor M. Semel United States
Nancy Benson Canada
Nina Neuhoff Germany
Fernando César Capovilla Brazil
Rachelle M. Bruno United States
Anita M.‐Y. Wong Hong Kong
Joan E. Backman relative to Carmen Cattaneo Italy Carmen Cattaneo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Carmen Cattaneo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joan E. Backman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joan E. Backman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan E. Backman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan E. Backman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joan E. Backman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan E. Backman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan E. Backman. The network helps show where Joan E. Backman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Joan E. Backman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joan E. Backman Line = papers co-authored together Joan E. Backman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 1984170
2 1991123
3 1984118
4 198352
5 198547
6
Effectiveness of the Lindamood Auditory Discrimination in Depth Program with Students with Learning Disabilities.
199325
7 198624
8 198721
9 197911
10 198611
11 198611
12 19958
13 19867
14 19865
15 19845
16 19872
17 20240
18 19890

About Joan E. Backman

Joan E. Backman is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Statistics and Probability and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 18 papers that have together received 640 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (6 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (4 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (4 papers), Language Development and Disorders (3 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (2 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (479 citations), Statistics and Probability (174 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (229 citations), Clinical Psychology (150 citations) and Education (178 citations). Joan E. Backman has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Bruck, Mark S. Seidenberg, H. Bruce Ferguson, Martine Hébert, Harry N. Bawden, Peter Camfield, Joseph M. Dooley, Joseph M. Byrne, Isabel M. Smith and Kenneth W. Dunn. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Applied Psycholinguistics, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, Learning Disabilities Research and Practice and Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact