Jo Bryce

26 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Jo Bryce
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 240
  • Gender Studies 138
  • Sociology and Political Science 649
  • Social Psychology 274
  • Communication 72
Replace Şirin Karadeniz with:
Şirin Karadeniz Türkiye
Norbert Groeben Germany
Howard E. Sypher United States
Avner Caspi Israel
Jiun‐Yu Wu Taiwan
Sei Jin Ko United States
James K. Beggan United States
Bradley M. Okdie United States
Olga V. Mitina Russia
Bryan L. Bonner United States
Jo Bryce relative to Şirin Karadeniz Türkiye Şirin Karadeniz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
Şirin Karadeniz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jo Bryce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Bryce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Bryce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Bryce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Bryce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Bryce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Bryce. The network helps show where Jo Bryce may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Jo Bryce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jo Bryce Line = papers co-authored together Jo Bryce links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009180
2 2003151
3 200299
4 201385
5 200680
6 200171
7
Putting the fun factor into gaming: The influence of social contexts on the experiences of playing videogames
201267
8 200262
9
The Gendering of Computer Gaming: Experience and Space
200348
10 200948
11 201341
12 200840
13 201425
14 201820
15
Gendered Gaming in Gendered Spaces
200520
16 200618
17
Spectacle of the Deathmatch: Character and Narrative in First Person Shooters
200217
18 200616
19 201814
20 201514

About Jo Bryce

Jo Bryce is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Gender Studies, Clinical Psychology and Communication, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (10 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (7 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (5 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers), Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (3 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers) and Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (240 citations), Gender Studies (138 citations), Sociology and Political Science (649 citations), Social Psychology (274 citations) and Communication (72 citations). Jo Bryce has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Jason Rutter, James I. Fraser, John T. Haworth, Linda Katherine Kaye, Nicola Graham‐Kevan, Cath Sullivan, Tanya Krzywinska, Gemma King, Michelle S. Lowe and Matthew Brooks. Their work appears in journals such as Leisure Studies, The Police Journal Theory Practice and Principles, Sociology, Social Science Computer Review and Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact