Jo Bryce

26 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Jo Bryce
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 249
  • Gender Studies 143
  • Sociology and Political Science 663
  • Social Psychology 274
  • Communication 71
Replace Howard E. Sypher with:
Howard E. Sypher United States
Avner Caspi Israel
Jiun‐Yu Wu Taiwan
Nicholas S. Holtzman United States
Jianxia Du United States
Bradley M. Okdie United States
Laurie Taylor United States
William D. Taylor United States
Moon J. Lee United States
María Pilar Cáceres Reche Spain
Jo Bryce relative to Howard E. Sypher United States Howard E. Sypher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Howard E. Sypher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jo Bryce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Bryce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Bryce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Bryce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Bryce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Bryce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Bryce. The network helps show where Jo Bryce may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Jo Bryce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jo Bryce Line = papers co-authored together Jo Bryce links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009182
2 2003152
3 2002100
4 200686
5 201386
6 200169
7
Putting the fun factor into gaming: The influence of social contexts on the experiences of playing videogames
201267
8 200265
9
The Gendering of Computer Gaming: Experience and Space
200348
10 200947
11 200844
12 201342
13 201426
14
Gendered Gaming in Gendered Spaces
200523
15 200621
16 201818
17
Spectacle of the Deathmatch: Character and Narrative in First Person Shooters
200217
18 200617
19 201514
20 201612

About Jo Bryce

Jo Bryce is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (10 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (7 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (5 papers), Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (3 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers) and Flow Experience in Various Fields (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (249 citations), Gender Studies (143 citations), Sociology and Political Science (663 citations), Social Psychology (274 citations) and Communication (71 citations). Jo Bryce has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Jason Rutter, James Fraser, John Haworth, Linda Kaye, Nicola Graham‐Kevan, Cath Sullivan, Tanya Krzywinska, Matthew Brooks, Roxanne Khan and Michelle Lowe. Their work appears in journals such as Leisure Studies, The Police Journal Theory Practice and Principles, Social Science Computer Review, Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking and Computers in Human Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact