Countries where authors publish in Social Science Computer Review
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Social Science Computer Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Social Science Computer Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Science Computer Review more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Social Science Computer Review
This network shows the impact of papers published in Social Science Computer Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Social Science Computer Review.
About Social Science Computer Review
The 1.6k papers published in Social Science Computer Review in the last decades have received a total of 49.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Social Science Computer Review usually cover General Social Sciences (171 papers), Communication (274 papers), Sociology and Political Science (632 papers), Information Systems (172 papers) and Media Technology (55 papers) specifically the topics of Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (269 papers), Social Media and Politics (212 papers), Computational and Text Analysis Methods (103 papers), E-Government and Public Services (84 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (72 papers), Information Society and Technology Trends (68 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (44 papers) and Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (44 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Social Science Computer Review are Eszter Hargittai, Mick P. Couper, Louis W. Leung, Joseph B. Walther, Grant Blank, Peter Spirtes, Clark Glymour, David J. Hand, Azy Barak and Paul K. McClure.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.