Social Science Computer Review

1.6k papers and 36.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Social Science Computer Review in the last decades have received a total of 36.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Social Science Computer Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (836 papers), Communication (502 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (191 papers) specifically the topics of Social Media and Politics (442 papers), Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (214 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (173 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Social Science Computer Review are Eszter Hargittai, Mick P. Couper, Louis Leung, Grant Blank, Michael Bošnjak, Joseph B. Walther, David J. Hand, Peter Spirtes, Clark Glymour and Martyn Denscombe.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Social Science Computer Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Social Science Computer Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Social Science Computer Review.

Countries where authors publish in Social Science Computer Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Social Science Computer Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Social Science Computer Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Science Computer Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025