Jinjun Xia

1.6k citations
73 papers · 1.2k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Jinjun Xia

64 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Jinjun Xia
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Biological Psychiatry 200
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 79
  • Biomedical Engineering 479
  • Analytical Chemistry 83
  • Animal Science and Zoology 71
Replace Chia‐Chen Chang with:
Chia‐Chen Chang Taiwan
Kenji Yamada Japan
M. Lundberg Sweden
Hiroyuki Ohta Japan
Jing Guo China
Susumu Satoh Japan
Yao Li China
Gordon Broderick United States
Jinjun Xia relative to Chia‐Chen Chang Taiwan Chia‐Chen Chang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
Chia‐Chen Chang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jinjun Xia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jinjun Xia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jinjun Xia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jinjun Xia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jinjun Xia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jinjun Xia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jinjun Xia. The network helps show where Jinjun Xia may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jinjun Xia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jinjun Xia Line = papers co-authored together Jinjun Xia links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018165
2 200679
3 201671
4 201552
5 201451
6 201550
7 201948
8 201448
9 201845
10 201445
11 201243
12 201442
13 201735
14 200728
15 201625
16 200822
17 199821
18 201320
19 201818
20 201817

About Jinjun Xia

Jinjun Xia is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Mechanics of Materials and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 73 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (28 papers), Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques (10 papers), Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (10 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (7 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (7 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (6 papers), Teleoperation and Haptic Systems (5 papers) and Space Satellite Systems and Control (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (200 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (79 citations), Biomedical Engineering (479 citations), Analytical Chemistry (83 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (71 citations). Jinjun Xia has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Ivan Pelivanov, Matthew O’Donnell, Gang Yao, Chen-Wei Wei, Peng Xie, Chen‐Wei Wei, E. P. Berg, Takashi Buma, Bastien Arnal and Junxi Pan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biomedical Optics, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Photoacoustics, Small and The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact