Jina Pakpoor

28 papers receiving 489 citations

Peers

Jina Pakpoor
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Medical Terminology 2
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 141
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 131
  • Health Informatics 6
  • Neurology 33
Replace Vincent Lin with:
Vincent Lin United States
Omid Moshtaghi United States
Yoon‐Hee Choi South Korea
Ludovico Pedullà Italy
Jessica Burggraaff Netherlands
Andrew J. Tatham United Kingdom
Steven L. Mansberger United States
Donny W. Suh United States
Julie‐Anne Little United Kingdom
Kevin Wong United States
Jina Pakpoor relative to Vincent Lin United States Vincent Lin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Vincent Lin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jina Pakpoor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jina Pakpoor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jina Pakpoor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jina Pakpoor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jina Pakpoor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jina Pakpoor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jina Pakpoor. The network helps show where Jina Pakpoor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jina Pakpoor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jina Pakpoor Line = papers co-authored together Jina Pakpoor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016141
2 2012126
3 202051
4 201223
5
A review of the adverse side effects associated with antipsychotics as related to their efficacy.
201421
6 201719
7 202016
8 201816
9
Virtual Reality in Neurointervention.
201812
10 201311
11 202210
12 20198
13 20197
14 20216
15 20165
16
Risks of psychiatric disorders in children and young adults with demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system: a national record-linkage study.
20164
17 20204
18 20144
19 20213
20 20143

About Jina Pakpoor

Jina Pakpoor is a scholar working on Surgery, Pharmacology, General Health Professions, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 31 papers that have together received 500 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (3 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (2 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (2 papers), Radiology practices and education (2 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (2 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Terminology (2 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (141 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (131 citations), Health Informatics (6 citations) and Neurology (33 citations). Jina Pakpoor has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Adrian M. Haith, John W. Krakauer, Gavin Giovannoni, Jennifer E. Gerber, S V Ramagopalan, Giulio Disanto, Ute‐Christiane Meier, Mark Agius, David M. Yousem and Stephen M. Prouty. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Neuroradiology, Multiple Sclerosis Journal, BMJ, Journal of the American College of Radiology and World Neurosurgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact