Julia Pakpoor

2.2k citations
35 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

    • Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies 16
    • Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases 3
    • Vitamin D Research Studies 2
    • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment 2
    • Microscopic Colitis 2

Julia Pakpoor

35 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Julia Pakpoor
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 421
  • Neurology 210
  • Immunology 148
  • Family Practice 12
  • Neurology 49
Replace Gina Remington with:
Gina Remington United States
Barbara Topol United States
D Goodkin United States
P. O’Connor Canada
Robert Hoepner Switzerland
Fotini Pittas Australia
Alan McDougall Australia
Mingkun Yu China
Róisín Lonergan Ireland
María Elena Díaz Sánchez Cuba
Julia Pakpoor relative to Gina Remington United States Gina Remington's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Gina Remington · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Pakpoor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Pakpoor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Pakpoor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Pakpoor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Pakpoor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Pakpoor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Pakpoor. The network helps show where Julia Pakpoor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Pakpoor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Pakpoor Line = papers co-authored together Julia Pakpoor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018174
2 2020118
3 2015103
4 201475
5 201270
6 201254
7 201343
8 201740
9 201636
10 201235
11 201434
12 201533
13 202133
14 201325
15 201720
16 201619
17 201318
18 201418
19 201717
20 201417

About Julia Pakpoor

Julia Pakpoor is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Epidemiology, Oncology, Rheumatology and Neurology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (16 papers), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (3 papers), Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (3 papers), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (2 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (2 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (2 papers) and Microscopic Colitis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (421 citations), Neurology (210 citations), Immunology (148 citations), Family Practice (12 citations) and Neurology (49 citations). Julia Pakpoor has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Gavin Giovannoni, Sreeram V Ramagopalan, Michael J Goldacre, Raph Goldacre, Giulio Disanto, Alastair J. Noyce, Thomas T. Warner, Eduardo De Pablo‐Fernández, Ruth Dobson and Klaus Schmierer. Their work appears in journals such as Multiple Sclerosis Journal, Neurology, PLoS ONE, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders and BMC Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact