Jill E. Darling

958 citations
30 papers · 658 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Jill E. Darling

29 papers receiving 631 citations

Peers

Jill E. Darling
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Health 88
  • Modeling and Simulation 48
  • General Health Professions 171
  • Research and Theory 5
  • Clinical Psychology 113
Replace Brian Aronson with:
Brian Aronson United States
Michael Niño United States
Olympia Konstantakopoulou Greece
George C. Pro United States
Aimen Ashini Libya
Carlo Handy Charles Canada
Seiichiro Tateishi Japan
Dede Kam Tyng Tham Singapore
Angi Alradie-Mohamed United Kingdom
Clifford Silver Tarimo China
Jill E. Darling relative to Brian Aronson United States Brian Aronson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.5×
Brian Aronson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jill E. Darling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jill E. Darling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jill E. Darling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jill E. Darling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jill E. Darling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jill E. Darling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jill E. Darling. The network helps show where Jill E. Darling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jill E. Darling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jill E. Darling Line = papers co-authored together Jill E. Darling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021100
2 202064
3 201963
4 201841
5 201541
6 202035
7 201534
8 201830
9 201828
10 201727
11 201826
12 198824
13 201823
14 202221
15 201917
16 202413
17 201811
18 20179
19 20229
20
The changing role of the trainer
19999

About Jill E. Darling

Jill E. Darling is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Modeling and Simulation, Research and Theory, Clinical Psychology and Pharmacy, having authored 30 papers that have together received 658 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (7 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (3 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (2 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (1 paper), Writing and Handwriting Education (1 paper), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper) and Nursing education and management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (88 citations), Modeling and Simulation (48 citations), General Health Professions (171 citations), Research and Theory (5 citations) and Clinical Psychology (113 citations). Jill E. Darling has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth Martin Yano, Arie Kapteyn, Ismelda A. Canelo, Kyla Thomas, Francisco Pérez‐Arce, Marco Angrisani, Daniel L. Bennett, Lisa V. Rubenstein, Lisa S. Meredith and Wändi Bruine de Bruin. Their work appears in journals such as Women s Health Issues, Medical Care, PLoS ONE, Nature Human Behaviour and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact