Kyla Thomas
Impact in
- Health top 0.5%
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Modeling and Simulation top 2%
- COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Papers in
- Health 10
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy 7
-
- Social and Cultural Dynamics 3
- Co-authors
- Arie Kapteyn (11 shared papers)Nathalie Vizueta (9 shared papers)Peter G. Szilagyi (9 shared papers)Sitaram Vangala (9 shared papers)Megha D. Shah (9 shared papers)Yan Cui (6 shared papers)Brian Karl Finch (7 shared papers)Rashmi Shetgiri (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Poetics (3 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)PEDIATRICS (2 papers)JAMA (2 papers)American Journal of Preventive Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNorway
In The Last Decade
Kyla Thomas
24 papers receiving 962 citations
Kyla Thomas's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Health 599
- Modeling and Simulation 101
- Infectious Diseases 169
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 64
- Clinical Psychology 145
Countries citing papers authored by Kyla Thomas
This map shows the geographic impact of Kyla Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kyla Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyla Thomas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kyla Thomas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kyla Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kyla Thomas. The network helps show where Kyla Thomas may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kyla Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parents’ Intentions and Perceptions About COVID-19 Vaccination for Their Children: Results From a National Survey Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 214 |
| 2 | 2020 | 208 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 103 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 96 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 95 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 68 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 34 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 29 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 27 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 17 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 4 |
About Kyla Thomas
Kyla Thomas is a scholar working on Health, Sociology and Political Science, Infectious Diseases, Modeling and Simulation and General Health Professions, having authored 24 papers that have together received 988 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (7 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (4 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (4 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (3 papers), Global Educational Policies and Reforms (2 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (2 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers) and COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (599 citations), Modeling and Simulation (101 citations), Infectious Diseases (169 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (64 citations) and Clinical Psychology (145 citations). Kyla Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Arie Kapteyn, Nathalie Vizueta, Peter G. Szilagyi, Sitaram Vangala, Megha D. Shah, Yan Cui, Brian Karl Finch, Rashmi Shetgiri, Ying Liu and Jill Darling. Their work appears in journals such as Poetics, PLoS ONE, PEDIATRICS, JAMA and American Journal of Preventive Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.