Jesse Stoops
Impact in
- Insect Science top 5%
- Insect Utilization and Effects
- Animal Science and Zoology top 5%
- Meat and Animal Product Quality
Papers in
-
- Meat and Animal Product Quality 4
-
- Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety 1
- Microbial Inactivation Methods 1
- Co-authors
- Leen Van Campenhout (7 shared papers)JOHAN E. CLAES (6 shared papers)Bart Lievens (3 shared papers)Sam Crauwels (2 shared papers)Michael Waud (1 shared paper)Christel Verreth (2 shared papers)Pieter Busschaert (1 shared paper)Stefan Ruyters (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Food Microbiology (2 papers)Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies (1 paper)Letters in Applied Microbiology (1 paper)Food and Bioprocess Technology (1 paper)Journal of Food Engineering (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Belgium
In The Last Decade
Jesse Stoops
7 papers receiving 351 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Insect Science 208
- Animal Science and Zoology 77
- Biotechnology 28
- Food Science 52
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 5
Countries citing papers authored by Jesse Stoops
This map shows the geographic impact of Jesse Stoops's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jesse Stoops with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jesse Stoops more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jesse Stoops
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jesse Stoops. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jesse Stoops. The network helps show where Jesse Stoops may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Jesse Stoops, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 166 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 84 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 77 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 7 | Effect of MAP, ethanol and the combination of MAP and ethanol on the shelf life of sliced bread | 2012 | 1 |
About Jesse Stoops
Jesse Stoops is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Biotechnology, Insect Science, Plant Science and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 7 papers that have together received 357 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (4 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (3 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (2 papers), Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (1 paper), Microbial Inactivation Methods (1 paper), Food composition and properties (1 paper) and Radiation Effects and Dosimetry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (208 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (77 citations), Biotechnology (28 citations), Food Science (52 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (5 citations). Jesse Stoops has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Leen Van Campenhout, JOHAN E. CLAES, Bart Lievens, Sam Crauwels, Michael Waud, Christel Verreth, Pieter Busschaert, Stefan Ruyters, D. Vandeweyer and Mik Van Der Borght. Their work appears in journals such as Food Microbiology, Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, Letters in Applied Microbiology, Food and Bioprocess Technology and Journal of Food Engineering.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.