Jay Odenbaugh

1.2k citations
34 papers · 542 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Jay Odenbaugh

30 papers receiving 477 citations

Peers

Jay Odenbaugh
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • History and Philosophy of Science 188
  • Ecological Modeling 61
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 133
  • Global and Planetary Change 156
  • General Decision Sciences 7
Replace James Justus with:
James Justus United States
Yasha Rohwer United States
Derek Turner United States
Philip F. Rehbock United States
Rudolf Haller Austria
Telmo Pievani Italy
Mary P. Winsor Canada
Hernán Cofré Chile
Rogier De Langhe Belgium
Janet Browne United States
Jay Odenbaugh relative to James Justus United States James Justus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
James Justus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay Odenbaugh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay Odenbaugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay Odenbaugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay Odenbaugh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay Odenbaugh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay Odenbaugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay Odenbaugh. The network helps show where Jay Odenbaugh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Jay Odenbaugh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay Odenbaugh Line = papers co-authored together Jay Odenbaugh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200599
2 200356
3 201154
4 200939
5 200737
6 200636
7 201930
8 200330
9 201121
10 201919
11 201718
12 201118
13 200113
14 200611
15 201511
16 20187
17 20147
18 20236
19 20095
20 20065

About Jay Odenbaugh

Jay Odenbaugh is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, History and Philosophy of Science, Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science and Ecological Modeling, having authored 34 papers that have together received 542 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (12 papers), Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (10 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (7 papers), Ecosystem dynamics and resilience (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (4 papers), Plant and animal studies (4 papers) and Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (188 citations), Ecological Modeling (61 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (133 citations), Global and Planetary Change (156 citations) and General Decision Sciences (7 citations). Jay Odenbaugh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Anna Alexandrova, Mark Colyvan, Hugh P. Possingham, Stefan Linquist, William Grey, Paul E. Griffiths, Frédéric Bouchard, Alison D. Munson, Steven W. Kembel and Geneviève Lajoie. Their work appears in journals such as Biology & Philosophy, Philosophy of Science, BioScience, Synthese and Environmental Values.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact