Anna Alexandrova

40 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Anna Alexandrova
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • History and Philosophy of Science 185
  • Health Informatics 46
  • General Decision Sciences 57
  • Safety Research 191
  • Applied Psychology 85
Replace Mark Alfano with:
Mark Alfano Australia
Amy Marcus‐Newhall United States
Keith A. Markus United States
John Hardwig United States
Т. М. Scanlon United States
James Friedrich United States
Karen Jones United Kingdom
Benzion Chanowitz United States
Philippa Foot United States
C. Thi Nguyen United States
Anna Alexandrova relative to Mark Alfano Australia Mark Alfano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.1×
Mark Alfano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Alexandrova

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Alexandrova's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Alexandrova with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Alexandrova more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Alexandrova

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Alexandrova. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Alexandrova. The network helps show where Anna Alexandrova may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Anna Alexandrova, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Alexandrova Line = papers co-authored together Anna Alexandrova links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017208
2 2019178
3 201667
4 200857
5 201657
6 200557
7 201154
8 201450
9 202146
10 202239
11 201236
12 202031
13 200631
14 202129
15 201329
16 200828
17 200517
18 200515
19 201215
20 201514

About Anna Alexandrova

Anna Alexandrova is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, History and Philosophy of Science and Philosophy, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (12 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers) and Economic Theory and Institutions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (185 citations), Health Informatics (46 citations), General Decision Sciences (57 citations), Safety Research (191 citations) and Applied Psychology (85 citations). Anna Alexandrova has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Cave, Jess Whittlestone, Rune Nyrup, Daniel M. Haybron, Jay Odenbaugh, Ramesh Raghavan, Mark Fabian, Robert Northcott, Polly Mitchell and Carl F. Craver. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, Journal of Happiness Studies, Journal of Economic Methodology, Res Philosophica and Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact