Jay A. Cherner

17 papers receiving 983 citations

Peers

Jay A. Cherner
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Gastroenterology 130
  • Epidemiology 448
  • Neurology 150
  • Oncology 216
  • Surgery 316
Replace Meenali M. Chitnis with:
Meenali M. Chitnis United Kingdom
Kazunobu Aso Japan
Feng Peng China
J.B. Foidart Belgium
Nobuyuki Nishizawa Japan
Kunimasa Yan Japan
Seiki Matsuno Japan
Kurumi Sasatomi Japan
Chongxiu Sun United States
Akitaka Hisatomi Japan
Jay A. Cherner relative to Meenali M. Chitnis United Kingdom Meenali M. Chitnis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.0×
Meenali M. Chitnis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay A. Cherner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay A. Cherner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay A. Cherner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay A. Cherner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay A. Cherner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay A. Cherner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay A. Cherner. The network helps show where Jay A. Cherner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jay A. Cherner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay A. Cherner Line = papers co-authored together Jay A. Cherner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1989227
2 1985169
3 1985163
4 1985123
5 1988122
6 198697
7
Comparison of the effectiveness of ranitidine and cimetidine in inhibiting acid secretion in patients with gastric hypersecretory states.
198462
8 198828
9 199224
10 198919
11 199014
12 199010
13
Comparison of nizatidine and cimetidine as once-nightly treatment of acute duodenal ulcer. Nizatidine Multicenter Duodenal Ulcer Study Group.
19898
14 19896
15 19865
16 19895
17 19903
18 20090
19 20090

About Jay A. Cherner

Jay A. Cherner is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery, Epidemiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Immunology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (7 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (5 papers), Polyamine Metabolism and Applications (4 papers), Mast cells and histamine (3 papers), Lung Cancer Research Studies (3 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (3 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (3 papers) and Organic and Inorganic Chemical Reactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (130 citations), Epidemiology (448 citations), Neurology (150 citations), Oncology (216 citations) and Surgery (316 citations). Jay A. Cherner has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jerry D. Gardner, Robert T. Jensen, Martin J. Collen, K.E. McArthur, John McLaren Howard, J. A. Barnard, Carol M. McCutchen, Robert J. Coffey, Robert Daniel Beauchamp and Paul N. Maton. Their work appears in journals such as Gastroenterology, American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Digestion, New England Journal of Medicine and Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact