Jason E. Field
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds
- Axial and Atropisomeric Chirality Synthesis
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Molecular spectroscopy and chirality
Papers in
-
- Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes 2
- Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds 2
- Fullerene Chemistry and Applications 1
- Co-authors
- D. Venkataraman (5 shared papers)James P. Riehl (1 shared paper)Gilles Muller (1 shared paper)Thomas J. Hill (1 shared paper)Scott L. Selco (2 shared papers)Russel A. Poldrack (2 shared papers)Neal J. Cohen (2 shared papers)Chad J. Marsolek (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (2 papers)Chemical Communications (2 papers)Chemistry of Materials (1 paper)Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (1 paper)The Journal of Organic Chemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Jason E. Field
9 papers receiving 613 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Organic Chemistry 430
- Spectroscopy 135
- Materials Chemistry 376
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 36
- Biomaterials 33
Countries citing papers authored by Jason E. Field
This map shows the geographic impact of Jason E. Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jason E. Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jason E. Field more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jason E. Field
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jason E. Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jason E. Field. The network helps show where Jason E. Field may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Jason E. Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 329 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 110 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 90 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 15 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 13 | |
| 7 | 1999 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 9 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 3 |
About Jason E. Field
Jason E. Field is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 618 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes (2 papers), Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds (2 papers), Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (2 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (1 paper), Fullerene Chemistry and Applications (1 paper), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (1 paper) and Child and Animal Learning Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (430 citations), Spectroscopy (135 citations), Materials Chemistry (376 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (36 citations) and Biomaterials (33 citations). Jason E. Field has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include D. Venkataraman, James P. Riehl, Gilles Muller, Thomas J. Hill, Scott L. Selco, Russel A. Poldrack, Neal J. Cohen, Chad J. Marsolek, Dirk Michael Guldi and Emanuel Vogel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Chemical Communications, Chemistry of Materials, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance and The Journal of Organic Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.