Janine Walker

37 papers receiving 748 citations

Peers

Janine Walker
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Rheumatology 149
  • Biological Psychiatry 20
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 142
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 25
  • Applied Psychology 26
Replace Kenta Matsumura with:
Kenta Matsumura Japan
Maryam Rahmani Iran
Xiayin Zhang China
Abdollah Omidi Iran
Shirley P.C. Ngai Hong Kong
J. Christiaan Keurentjes Netherlands
Kathy Tangalakis Australia
Stephen T. Chen United States
Somsak Mitrirattanakul Thailand
Valeria Giorgi Italy
Janine Walker relative to Kenta Matsumura Japan Kenta Matsumura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.2×
Kenta Matsumura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janine Walker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janine Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janine Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janine Walker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janine Walker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janine Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janine Walker. The network helps show where Janine Walker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janine Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janine Walker Line = papers co-authored together Janine Walker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011132
2 200486
3 199984
4 201072
5 200651
6 201441
7 201640
8 202139
9 200629
10 200928
11 201025
12 200924
13 199322
14 200217
15 200916
16 201715
17 201511
18 20119
19
Enhancing object contrast using augmented depth improves mobility in patients implanted with a retinal prosthesis
20158
20
Mobility Experiments With Simulated Vision and sensory substitution of Depth
20117

About Janine Walker

Janine Walker is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Social Psychology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 813 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (12 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (6 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (3 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (3 papers), CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (3 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (2 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (2 papers) and Older Adults Driving Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rheumatology (149 citations), Biological Psychiatry (20 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (142 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (25 citations) and Applied Psychology (26 citations). Janine Walker has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Geoffrey Littlejohn, Helen Christensen, Andrew Mackinnon, Nick Barnes, Henry J. Jackson, Philip J. Batterham, Michael Fenech, Ian B. Hickie, Anthony F. Jorm and Nancy E. McMurray. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Journal of Neural Engineering, Artificial Organs, Translational Vision Science & Technology and Journal of Vision.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact