Janine Walker

36 papers receiving 713 citations

Peers

Janine Walker
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Rheumatology 146
  • Biological Psychiatry 19
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 134
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 23
  • Applied Psychology 24
Replace Richard Tranter with:
Richard Tranter United Kingdom
Maryam Rahmani Iran
Kenta Matsumura Japan
Abdollah Omidi Iran
J. Christiaan Keurentjes Netherlands
Shirley P.C. Ngai Hong Kong
Somsak Mitrirattanakul Thailand
Valeria Giorgi Italy
Kathy Tangalakis Australia
Nikolaos Christidis Sweden
Janine Walker relative to Richard Tranter United Kingdom Richard Tranter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Richard Tranter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janine Walker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janine Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janine Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janine Walker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janine Walker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janine Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janine Walker. The network helps show where Janine Walker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janine Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janine Walker Line = papers co-authored together Janine Walker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011124
2 199979
3 200476
4 201069
5 200650
6 201438
7 202138
8 201637
9 200628
10 200927
11 201025
12 200924
13 201715
14 199315
15 200914
16 200213
17 201510
18 20119
19
Enhancing object contrast using augmented depth improves mobility in patients implanted with a retinal prosthesis
20158
20
Mobility Experiments With Simulated Vision and sensory substitution of Depth
20117

About Janine Walker

Janine Walker is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Social Psychology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 761 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (11 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (5 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (3 papers), CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (3 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (2 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (2 papers), Older Adults Driving Studies (2 papers) and Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rheumatology (146 citations), Biological Psychiatry (19 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (134 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (23 citations) and Applied Psychology (24 citations). Janine Walker has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Geoffrey Littlejohn, Helen Christensen, Andrew Mackinnon, Nick Barnes, Michael Fenech, Ian B. Hickie, Philip J. Batterham, Henry J. Jackson, Anthony F. Jorm and Nancy E. McMurray. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Translational Vision Science & Technology, Journal of Neural Engineering, Artificial Organs and Veterinary Record.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact