Chi D. Luu

6.8k citations
179 papers · 4.8k · h-index 41

Impact in

Papers in

Chi D. Luu

175 papers receiving 4.7k citations

Peers

Chi D. Luu
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Ophthalmology 2.1k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.0k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 703
  • Neurology 166
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 306
Replace Bang V. Bui with:
Bang V. Bui Australia
Benedetto Falsini Italy
Yozo Miyake Japan
Jindong Ding United States
Yeni H. Yücel Canada
Dong Feng Chen United States
Brad Fortune United States
Alexander Klistorner Australia
Adriana Di Polo Canada
David J. Calkins United States
Chi D. Luu relative to Bang V. Bui Australia Bang V. Bui's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Bang V. Bui · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chi D. Luu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chi D. Luu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chi D. Luu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chi D. Luu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chi D. Luu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chi D. Luu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chi D. Luu. The network helps show where Chi D. Luu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chi D. Luu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chi D. Luu Line = papers co-authored together Chi D. Luu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 179 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014206
2 2014149
3 2011125
4 2016124
5 2013117
6 2018116
7 1997114
8 2013110
9 201092
10 201187
11 201587
12 201579
13 201478
14 201478
15 201277
16 201872
17 201471
18 201968
19 201065
20 201263

About Chi D. Luu

Chi D. Luu is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 179 papers that have together received 4.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (45 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (40 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (30 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (13 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (12 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (10 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (10 papers) and Retinal and Macular Surgery (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (2.1k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.0k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (703 citations), Neurology (166 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (306 citations). Chi D. Luu has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Singapore and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robyn H. Guymer, Lauren N. Ayton, Zhichao Wu, Wallace S. Foulds, Veluchamy A. Barathi, Charanjit Kaur, Sivakumar Viswanathan, William C. Hubbard, Jill L. Hageman and Lúcia Míriam Dumont Lucci. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Translational Vision Science & Technology, Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology and Ophthalmology Retina.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact