Hugh Dennett

544 citations
9 papers · 435 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Hugh Dennett

9 papers receiving 426 citations

Peers

Hugh Dennett
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 389
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 174
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 185
  • Neurology 39
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 33
Replace Goedele Van Belle with:
Goedele Van Belle Belgium
Luc Boutsen United Kingdom
Vadim Axelrod Israel
Joseph Arizpe United States
Madeleine Pidcock Australia
Joan Liu‐Shuang Belgium
Günter Meinhardt Germany
Yunjo Lee Canada
Talia L. Retter France
Alina Liberman United States
Hugh Dennett relative to Goedele Van Belle Belgium Goedele Van Belle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Goedele Van Belle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hugh Dennett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hugh Dennett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hugh Dennett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hugh Dennett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hugh Dennett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hugh Dennett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hugh Dennett. The network helps show where Hugh Dennett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Hugh Dennett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hugh Dennett Line = papers co-authored together Hugh Dennett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2011175
2 201188
3 201265
4 201065
5 201126
6
Mobility Experiments With Simulated Vision and sensory substitution of Depth
20117
7 20124
8 20113
9 20102

About Hugh Dennett

Hugh Dennett is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Automotive Engineering, having authored 9 papers that have together received 435 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (7 papers), Face recognition and analysis (4 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (2 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (2 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers), Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (1 paper) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (389 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (174 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (185 citations), Neurology (39 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (33 citations). Hugh Dennett has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Elinor McKone, Mark Edwards, Madeleine Pidcock, Ashleigh Hall, Bradley Duchaine, Tirta Susilo, Romina Palermo, Joshua M. Davis, Richard O’Kearney and Amy Dawel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vision, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Psychological Science, Behavior Research Methods and Cognitive Neuropsychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact