Janice McLaughlin

1.4k citations
55 papers · 900 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Janice McLaughlin

55 papers receiving 813 citations

Peers

Janice McLaughlin
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Safety Research 176
  • Human-Computer Interaction 84
  • Occupational Therapy 63
  • Sociology and Political Science 360
  • Clinical Psychology 154
Replace Bruce B. Frey with:
Bruce B. Frey United States
Stephen J. Macdonald United Kingdom
Emma Smith United Kingdom
Alecia M. Santuzzi United States
Jacqueline Specht Canada
Susanne M Bruyère United States
Keith Tuffin New Zealand
Sally Baldwin United States
Judith C. Lapadat Canada
Paul Richardson Australia
Janice McLaughlin relative to Bruce B. Frey United States Bruce B. Frey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Bruce B. Frey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janice McLaughlin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janice McLaughlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janice McLaughlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janice McLaughlin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janice McLaughlin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janice McLaughlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janice McLaughlin. The network helps show where Janice McLaughlin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janice McLaughlin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janice McLaughlin Line = papers co-authored together Janice McLaughlin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201784
2 201080
3 200153
4 200851
5 199850
6 200734
7 200833
8
Families Raising Disabled Children: Enabling Care and Social Justice
200832
9 201427
10 200526
11 201425
12 201825
13 201822
14 200022
15 200321
16 201220
17 201718
18 200118
19 201617
20 200617

About Janice McLaughlin

Janice McLaughlin is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, Education, General Health Professions and Gender Studies, having authored 55 papers that have together received 900 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Disability Rights and Representation (8 papers), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (7 papers), Children's Rights and Participation (7 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (6 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers), Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies (4 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (4 papers) and Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (176 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (84 citations), Occupational Therapy (63 citations), Sociology and Political Science (360 citations) and Clinical Psychology (154 citations). Janice McLaughlin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Dan Goodley, Andrew Webster, John Vines, David Skinner, Pamela Fisher, Peter Wright, Joan Huber, Andrew Webster, Katherine Jackson and Eileen Kaner. Their work appears in journals such as Sociology, Social Theory & Health, Sociology of Health & Illness, The Sociological Review and Politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact