Countries where authors publish in Social Theory & Health
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Social Theory & Health. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Social Theory & Health with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Theory & Health more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Social Theory & Health
This network shows the impact of papers published in Social Theory & Health. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Social Theory & Health.
About Social Theory & Health
The 484 papers published in Social Theory & Health in the last decades have received a total of 8.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Social Theory & Health usually cover Pharmacy (45 papers), General Health Professions (230 papers), Health (59 papers), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (8 papers) and Research and Theory (4 papers) specifically the topics of Mental Health and Patient Involvement (75 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (56 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (44 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (44 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (40 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (34 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (27 papers) and Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Social Theory & Health are Deborah Lupton, Graham Scambler, Lee F. Monaghan, Iliya Gutin, Nikolas Rose, Lucy Aphramor, Vinh‐Kim Nguyen, Emma Rich, John Evans and Simon J. Williams.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.